Difference between revisions of "Error propagation in Amplitude Analysis"

From UConn PAN
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
       \right]
 
       \right]
 
     }
 
     }
 +
  }
 +
= \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{
 +
      u_\alpha u_\beta^* \left[ \sum_{\gamma,\delta}{\rho_{\gamma\delta}
 +
      \frac{1}{N_{gen}}\sum_i^N{
 +
        A_\alpha^{\gamma}(x_i) A_\beta^{\delta *}(x_i)
 +
      }
 +
    }\right]
 
   }
 
   }
 
= \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{
 
= \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{
 
       u_\alpha u_\beta^* I_{\alpha\beta}
 
       u_\alpha u_\beta^* I_{\alpha\beta}
 
     }
 
     }
  }
 
 
</math>
 
</math>
  

Revision as of 17:12, 22 November 2011

The following is a review of error propagation needed to compute the errors on the normalization integrals and the intensity sum that is based on them. Consider the estimator for the intensity for a given PWA solution, based on a sum over a Monte Carlo sample with Ngen phase space events generated and N reconstructed and passing all cuts.

where the PWA sum is over n coherent amplitudes, and indices γ, δ represent the spins of the external particles (incoming photon, incoming and outgoing nucleon), with ρ representing their collective spin-density matrix. When amplitude analysis fits contain amplitudes with no free parameters, it is convenient to rearrange the summations above, to pre-compute the sum over the intensities of the events:

storing the term in square brackets, a matrix indexed by α,β, for contractions with varying free production parameters u in the course of a fit.

When considering the uncertainty on the overall integral, both the errors on u parameters and those from the finite MC set of events will contribute. A single detected event (i) can be viewed as one sample in a process of independent events, having therefore a count uncertainty of σi=1. An integral over such events is then a weighted sum of such samples, having resulting in a contribution to the variance:

The relevant piece to pre-compute over the event set for error calculation is shown in brackets. Turning our attention now to the contribution to error on the production parameters u:

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle = \sum_{\gamma,\delta,\gamma',\delta'}{ \rho_{\gamma\delta} \rho_{\gamma'\delta'} \sum_{\alpha,\alpha'}^n{ \left(\sigma_{u_\alpha}\sigma^*_{u_{\alpha'}}\right) G^{\gamma\delta*}_\alpha G_{\alpha'}^{\gamma\delta} } } }

The product of σ terms in the summation is represented by the error matrix derived from the fit. G was defined as

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle G_\alpha^{\gamma\delta}=\sum_\beta{ u_\beta J_{\alpha\beta}^{\gamma\delta}} }

The overall uncertainty in the integral I defined in the beginning comes out to:

Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sigma_I=\sqrt{\sigma^2_{MC} + \sigma^2_{fit}} }