Difference between revisions of "Talk:Temperature Scheduling in Simulated Annealing"

Latest revision as of 21:09, 16 January 2008

When you introduce Parsa, you should provide a reference and mention the names of the original authors. You do that for published articles elsewhere, why not for software packages too?
Under the Convergence section, you should make a paragraph break at the point where you start discussing the MIR scheduling in detail. At present, it looks like equations 1-2 are general, whereas I think they are specific to the MIR strategy.
It is not clear to the reader what the significance is of the several figures near the end of various SA runs. Some of them show comparisons with algorithms we do not know about. Better to just show data from runs that you did yourself using different scheduling strategies with parsa.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 # When you introduce Parsa, you should provide a reference and mention the names of the original authors.  You do that for published articles elsewhere, why not for software packages too?
-# In the table where you list temperature criteria for different stages, you need to define the quantities like C and m in the nearby text, and refer in the caption to the place where the explanation is found in the text.
+# Under the Convergence section, you should make a paragraph break at the point where you start discussing the MIR scheduling in detail.  At present, it looks like equations 1-2 are general, whereas I think they are specific to the MIR strategy.
+# It is not clear to the reader what the significance is of the several figures near the end of various SA runs.  Some of them show comparisons with algorithms we do not know about.  Better to just show data from runs that you did yourself using different scheduling strategies with parsa.