Difference between revisions of "Error propagation in Amplitude Analysis"
Senderovich (talk | contribs) m |
Senderovich (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
} | } | ||
\right] | \right] | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | = \sum_{\gamma,\delta}{\rho_{\gamma\delta} | ||
| + | \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{ | ||
| + | u_\alpha u_\beta^* J_{\alpha \beta} | ||
} | } | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 78: | Line 83: | ||
\sum_{\gamma,\delta}{\rho_{\gamma\delta} | \sum_{\gamma,\delta}{\rho_{\gamma\delta} | ||
\sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{ | \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{ | ||
| − | u_\alpha u_\beta^* | + | u_\alpha u_\beta^* J_{\alpha\beta} |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
} | } | ||
} | } | ||
\right) | \right) | ||
| − | \frac{\partial}{\partial u_l} | + | \frac{\partial}{\partial u_l}\left( |
| − | \sum_{\gamma,\delta}{\rho_{\gamma\delta} | + | \sum_{\gamma',\delta'}{\rho_{\gamma'\delta'} |
| − | \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{ | + | \sum_{\alpha',\beta'}^n{ |
| − | u_\alpha u_\beta^* | + | u_{\alpha'} u_{\beta'}^* J_{\alpha'\beta'} |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
} | } | ||
} | } | ||
\right) | \right) | ||
} | } | ||
| − | |||
</math> | </math> | ||
| + | The product of σ terms in the summation are the error matrix derived from the fit. | ||
Revision as of 01:49, 22 November 2011
The following is a review of error propagation needed in amplitude analysis.
Consider a Monte-Carlo (MC) integral over the intensities of N detected events out of Ngen generated.
where we take n coherent amplitudes and allow incoherent sums indexed by γ, δ to allow for applications like spin-density matrices (ρ). When amplitude analysis fits contain amplitudes with not free parameters, it is convenient to rearrange the summations above, to pre-compute the sum over the intensities of the events:
storing the term in square brackets, a matrix indexed by α,β, for contractions with varying free production parameters u in the course of a fit.
When considering the uncertainty on the overall integral, both the errors on u parameters and those from the finite MC set of events will contribute. A single detected event (i) can be viewed as one sample of a Poisson process, having therefore an uncertainty of σi=1. An integral over such events is then a weighted sum of such samples, having therefore a contribution to the variance:
- Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle = \sum_{\gamma,\delta,\gamma',\delta'}{ \rho_{\gamma\delta}\rho_{\gamma'\delta'} \sum_{\alpha,\beta,\alpha',\beta'}^n{ u_\alpha u_\beta^* u_{\alpha'} u_{\beta'}^* \left[ \frac{1}{N_{gen}^2} \sum_i^N{ A_\alpha^{\gamma \delta}(x_i) A_\beta^{\gamma \delta *}(x_i) A_{\alpha'}^{\gamma' \delta'}(x_i) A_{\beta'}^{\gamma' \delta' *}(x_i) } \right] } } }
The relevant piece to pre-compute over the event set for error calculation is shown in brackets. Turning our attention now to the contribution to error on the production parameters u:
Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \sigma_{fit}^2= \sum_{k,l}^n{ \sigma_{u_k}\sigma_{u_l} \frac{\partial}{\partial u_k}\left( \sum_{\gamma,\delta}{\rho_{\gamma\delta} \sum_{\alpha,\beta}^n{ u_\alpha u_\beta^* J_{\alpha\beta} } } \right) \frac{\partial}{\partial u_l}\left( \sum_{\gamma',\delta'}{\rho_{\gamma'\delta'} \sum_{\alpha',\beta'}^n{ u_{\alpha'} u_{\beta'}^* J_{\alpha'\beta'} } } \right) } } The product of σ terms in the summation are the error matrix derived from the fit.