Difference between revisions of "ParSA Results"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|[[Image:demas1.png|thumb|The best solution found amongst several simulated annealing runs.]] | |[[Image:demas1.png|thumb|The best solution found amongst several simulated annealing runs.]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | {|align= | + | {|align=center |
|[[Image:truth2.png|thumb|The back diamond surface used to generate the interferogram in the test problem.]] | |[[Image:truth2.png|thumb|The back diamond surface used to generate the interferogram in the test problem.]] | ||
|[[Image:demas2.png|thumb|The best solution found amongst several simulated annealing runs.]] | |[[Image:demas2.png|thumb|The best solution found amongst several simulated annealing runs.]] | ||
Revision as of 06:39, 2 June 2008
Solutions
Interferograms
The set of images to the right depict the test interferogram analyzed using ParSA and the best interferogram solution found by ParSA. When compared visually, the two interferograms are nearly indistinguishable. This comparison shows that the solution found by the ParSA algorithm is a good one.
