ParSA Results

From UConn PAN
Revision as of 06:57, 2 June 2008 by DemasMa (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Solutions

Interferograms

Figure 1: The test interferogram created from three random surfaces.
Figure 2: The best solution found amongst several simulated annealing runs.

The set of images in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 depict the test interferogram analyzed using ParSA and the best interferogram solution found by ParSA. When compared visually, the two interferograms are nearly indistinguishable. This comparison shows that the solution found by the ParSA algorithm is a good one.

Surfaces

Fig. 3 and Fig. 5 show the front and back surfaces of the diamond wafer used to create the test interferogram depicted in Fig. 1. Fig. 4 and Fig. 6 show the solutions found by the ParSA algorithm which generated the interferogram shown in Fig. 2. The incident light used to create each of the interferograms

Figure 3: The front diamond surface used to generate the interferogram in the test problem.
Figure 4: The best solution found amongst several simulated annealing runs.
Figure 5: The back diamond surface used to generate the interferogram in the test problem.
Figure 6: The best solution found amongst several simulated annealing runs.

Performance

Log of probability versus non-convergence versus log of run length for alpha=0.5.
Log of probability versus non-convergence versus log of run length for alpha=0.9.